Construction projects today involve increasing complexity, leading to more frequent and intricate disputes. To avoid costly litigation and secure a decision-maker with industry expertise, many in the construction industry turn to alternative dispute resolution (ADR), with the first critical step being the drafting of an effective ADR clause.
Effective ADR clauses begin with intentional drafting rather than the use of generic or recycled language that can lead to ambiguity and costly procedural disputes. Construction professionals must carefully design ADR clauses that reflect the specific needs of their projects, considering factors such as the project’s size, the nature of the relationship between the parties, and the potential for various types of disputes.
Draft with Intention: One Size Does Not Fit All
A successful ADR clause is tailored to the circumstances of the project, avoiding boilerplate language to provide clarity and prevent disputes over procedural issues. Key elements, such as the project’s size and the types of potential disputes, must be carefully considered from the outset.
An ADR clause that accurately reflects the project’s dynamics and specifies key procedural elements, such as the number of arbitrators, governing rules, and the locale of the arbitration, can significantly reduce the risk of procedural delays and jurisdictional challenges. By designating the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution’s® (AAA-ICDR®) Construction Rules in your dispute resolution clause, you grant the AAA-ICDR jurisdiction over the matter, providing a framework to resolve many drafting issues and avoid the need for litigation. By addressing these issues early, you create a solid foundation for smooth, efficient, and enforceable dispute resolution.
One often overlooked aspect of clause drafting in construction contracts involves downstream contracts. To prevent issues when attempting to join third parties to disputes, it’s essential to include consistent language related to joinder in the prime and subcontracts. Tools such as the AAA-ICDR’s ClauseBuilder® AI (Beta) can streamline the process of drafting ADR clauses, providing construction professionals with an easy way to tailor clauses to specific project needs. ClauseBuilder AI helps to mitigate common drafting errors and incorporates key procedural elements all while saving time and reducing the risk of ambiguity.
Tiered Clauses Help Resolve Disputes Early—If Used Strategically
Another key strategy in ADR clause drafting is the use of multistep or tiered clauses, which require negotiation or mediation before arbitration. These clauses are particularly effective in addressing disputes early in the process before legal positions have hardened.
Tiered ADR clauses provide a structured process for resolving issues early, promoting engagement, reducing legal costs, and helping preserve working relationships. When these clauses are included in contracts from the outset, they create a roadmap for conflict resolution that can avoid escalation.
Clauses Must Align with State Jurisdictional Rules
Another important consideration when drafting ADR clauses is ensuring they align with state jurisdictional rules. The use of generic forum selection and governing law provisions can lead to complications, particularly in construction, where various states have statutes that provide protection to specific parties.
If an ADR clause designates an out-of-state law or venue, it may be unenforceable, which can lead to confusion and delays in resolving the dispute. Such misalignment could force parties into litigation rather than allowing for resolution through ADR.
Cross-Border Projects Benefit from International Arbitration
For international construction projects, where parties, operations, and legal systems span multiple jurisdictions, carefully drafted international arbitration clauses are essential. Under the International Centre for Dispute Resolution’s® Arbitration Rules, arbitration provides a neutral and effective forum for dispute resolution. The enforceability of arbitral awards under the New York Convention allows parties to secure recognition and enforcement in more than 170 countries, making it a highly advantageous option for cross-border projects.
A well-crafted arbitration clause can prevent future complications by clearly outlining key elements such as the seat of arbitration and the language of proceedings. These considerations play a critical role in making the arbitration process efficient, fair, and enforceable. By selecting the right seat and language, parties can avoid unnecessary procedural delays and facilitate the recognition and enforcement of the award in different jurisdictions.
Additionally, by opting for arbitration over litigation in national courts, parties can reduce the risk of home-court bias and procedural unpredictability. Arbitration also offers flexibility in adapting to differing legal traditions, such as common law and civil law, allowing parties to tailor procedures to their specific needs and expectations.
When drafting international arbitration clauses, precision is key. ClauseBuilder AI can guide parties through the complexities of cross-border arbitration and help them create agreements that are both comprehensive and effective.
Conclusion
Designing effective ADR clauses is essential for managing disputes in construction projects. By drafting clear, intentional clauses that define key procedural elements upfront, align with jurisdictional rules, and incorporate multistep resolution processes, construction professionals can reduce delays, costs, and conflicts.
Proactive planning through well-crafted ADR clauses helps create a smoother, more predictable dispute resolution process when challenges arise, and tools such as ClauseBuilder AI make this process more efficient, precise, and predictable.
To learn how top industry leaders are managing risk with capital-intensive projects, download our construction report.